[isabelle-dev] (Re-)introducing set as a type constructor rather than as mere abbreviation

Alexander Krauss krauss at in.tum.de
Thu Aug 25 11:14:50 CEST 2011

On 08/24/2011 03:36 PM, Lawrence Paulson wrote:
> I've just been trying to get the proofs working, not to simplify them
> or even to understand them. Incidentally, let there be no illusions
> about people accidentally stumbling into a mixture of sets and
> predicates. Some of these theories were clearly designed from the
> ground upwards on the premise that sets and predicates were the same
> thing.

I removed most of the duplication now in the main afp repos, which 
compiles again.

I'll have a more closer look at these theories in the next days.

Here are Larry's changesets, for reference:


More information about the isabelle-dev mailing list