[isabelle-dev] (Re-)introducing set as a type constructor rather than as mere abbreviation
florian.haftmann at informatik.tu-muenchen.de
Thu Aug 25 22:14:05 CEST 2011
> Should we ask a wider audience (isabelle-users) if anybody else has good reasons against/for a change?
The thought deserves attention, but I think the discussion is too early
Indeed, this is where, as I deem, we current are:
* Some agreement that mixing sets and predicate syntax in specifications
* We try where we get if we reduce this.
Whether this will ultimately result in a separte set type constructor is
still an open question.
All the best,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the isabelle-dev