[isabelle-dev] (Re-)introducing set as a type constructor rather than as mere abbreviation

Florian Haftmann florian.haftmann at informatik.tu-muenchen.de
Thu Aug 25 22:14:05 CEST 2011

> Should we ask a wider audience (isabelle-users) if anybody else has good reasons against/for a change?

The thought deserves attention, but I think the discussion is too early
for that.

Indeed, this is where, as I deem, we current are:
* Some agreement that mixing sets and predicate syntax in specifications
has drawbacks.
* We try where we get if we reduce this.

Whether this will ultimately result in a separte set type constructor is
still an open question.

All the best,



PGP available:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://mailman46.in.tum.de/pipermail/isabelle-dev/attachments/20110825/372df0ca/attachment.sig>

More information about the isabelle-dev mailing list