[isabelle-dev] Isabelle2016-RC0: potential changes
florian.haftmann at informatik.tu-muenchen.de
Thu Jan 14 11:45:00 CET 2016
>> Note that the classes (semi)ring_gcd in Isabelle2015 had no lemmas and
>> thus very hardly different from syntactic classes, so there is no loss
>> of generality here.
> I disagree with this second item: the classes (semi)ring_gcd in Isabelle2015 have
> the three essential lemmas:
> gcd_dvd1, gcd_dvd2, and gcd_greatest.
indeed, but these are exactly the assumptions of the type class.
> And since you want to include the patch anyway, why not include at least the instance now?
It sits on top of a couple of other patches definitely not suitable for
inclusion by now.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the isabelle-dev