florian.haftmann at informatik.tu-muenchen.de
Tue Jul 5 20:02:14 CEST 2016
> What about adding it to the ab_group_add typeclass? I know this is not
> the usual mathematical syntax for permutations, but at least we can
> reuse a lot of theorems from this type class.
There *is* reuse since there is a separate interpretation of the
abstract ab_group locale.
I once met an algebraist who preferred + for abelian groups and *
otherwise, and this makes sense.
> - Johannes
> Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2016, 19:40 +0200 schrieb Florian Haftmann:
>>> One question: why did you only set it up for monoid_mult and
>>> and not as a ab_group_mult?
>> The answer is simple: there is no type class
>> ab_group_mult. Why? Since
>> our multiplicative structures are tailored towards rings where 0 is
>> part of the multiplicative group.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the isabelle-dev